smooth for meWill this 7600 GT run company of heroes maxed smoothly?
[QUOTE=''couly'']smooth for me[/QUOTE]
with everything maxed, on ultra, running fast paced and smoothly, like in gamespots videos, even in intense harsh battles?
[QUOTE=''TakaNui''][QUOTE=''couly'']smooth for me[/QUOTE]
with everything maxed, on ultra, running fast paced and smoothly, like in gamespots videos, even in intense harsh battles?[/QUOTE]
my 7800gt runs it at 1600x1200 with all else maxed smoothly, so as long as you've got rec spec cpu and ram, i don't see why the 7600gt would struggle with 1024x
[QUOTE=''A-S_FM'']my 7800gt runs it at 1600x1200 with all else maxed smoothly, so as long as you've got rec spec cpu and ram, i don't see why the 7600gt would struggle with 1024x[/QUOTE]
i have 2 gb DDR RAM and an AMD Athlon XP 3000+ processor. ive heard it will from ''1'' person, so i wanted to know
My 7800GT didn't run smoothly @ 1680x1050 maxed, with a Core2 6800Xtreme, and the 7800GT was overclocked. Obviously your definition of ''smooth'' is different than mine. Perhaps the word your looking for is ''Playable''. Even at 1280x1024 it wasn't very smooth.
I've got a PCIe 7600GT from evga and I can run any game new or old on max settings at 1024x768 (I prefer that - anything over is excessive). I only have a gig of ram and a 3500+, so the 7600GT is doing all the work. I'm sure it's a bit faster than the AGP version, but you should be able to run CoH maxed or at least max at 800x600.
[QUOTE=''A-S_FM'']my 7800gt runs it at 1600x1200 with all else maxed smoothly, so as long as you've got rec spec cpu and ram, i don't see why the 7600gt would struggle with 1024x[/QUOTE]
What? Hah! My old SLI 7800GTX's had a problem running that game with all options maxed. I call BS.
No way...
My card runs it at 50fps maxed out: x1950xtx at 1200 by 1000 rez. If i go upto 1600 by 1200 then it goes down to 30.The 7600gt is ALOT less powerful and wont be able to do it.
I have a 7600gs 256mb and run it at max(except for tree detail which is at medium) at 1280x960 it runs very nicely, even in big battles. So since 7600gt is a bit faster than the 7600gs, I guess it would run great, especially at 1024x768 or 800x600.
Edit: Oh, I just checked, I have textures set to high, not ultra. It's not too much of a difference, unless you zoom all the way in and carefully analyse the textures on soldiers clothing.
Dnt know about ''MAX' but should run pretty high IMO It ran Med @ 1024x768 on my 6600 and only lagged when I was using 6 long ange artilery to blow out a couple of tanks :P
.. I doubt it, your guys' definition of ''smooth'' must mean at 30fps, i was running this game before i upgraded my comp on this old specs; Nvidia 7950 GX2 1.3Ghz 1GB DDR3 Memory, 1Gb RAM, intel p4 single core 3.2ghz
but now i have yet to find a game that WONT run at max with my new pc :) .
I dont see how it would, I have a 7950GT, run the game most things max and the rest medium at 1280x1024 at an average of 50+fps, I dont see how a 7600GT could get this game with that pefromance at max, look at Gamespots peformance guide.
with Duo core 6300, 2GB Ram (dual channel) 15,000rpm hard disk and a 7600GT,
this game will smoothly at 1024x resolution with everything maxed up, got an average of 45fps,
those pp thatl gave a fortune for their pcs and mubbling about 50fps and 100fps should get a life,
the game is ''playable'' with my old pc (AMD 2200,512RAM,ATI9800)
the 7600GT is more than capable to run this game smoothly, since is it was designed to even run with older cards than that,
any average frame rate above 40FPS is an exaggeration IMO, because practically you see no difference,
an increased FPS rate would secure that there are no problems to the games ruthms under any circumstances and the frequency such problems may appear is what makes the game playable.
I havent experienced more than one or two in the entire game's length and that was because 2-3 more programs were running in the background... thats is not just playable, its smooth enough, the rest is an exaggeration, there is plenty of room for them...
1650x1050 widescreen for me, homey. Granted, I have 2GB of memory, a core 2 duo, and a suhweeeeet 680i chipset motherboard, but ya...a 7600GT will run it maxed for you.
1st off, ChocoKat, the game had SLi problems from release, a patch had to fix it, its at the end of gamespots review...
now, im going with itll be maxed, but even in the largest of battles? running smoothly and quickly?
[QUOTE=''TakaNui'']1st off, ChocoKat, the game had SLi problems from release, a patch had to fix it, its at the end of gamespots review...
now, im going with itll be maxed, but even in the largest of battles? running smoothly and quickly? [/QUOTE]
No way will it be smooth and quick through large battles at max settings, I would imagine it would be ok but I would consider smooth for COH above the 40fps mark, with all that crap going on at once at max settings I dont see how a 7600GT could get more than 30fps.
It says on Gamespots Hardware guide that maxed out at 1280x1024 a Radeon X1950 Crossfire can only benchmark 30fps average, so I cant see how a 7600GT could stack up at that quality, but I doubt it would be what you could call smooth.
[QUOTE=''TakaNui'']1st off, ChocoKat, the game had SLi problems from release, a patch had to fix it, its at the end of gamespots review...
now, im going with itll be maxed, but even in the largest of battles? running smoothly and quickly? [/QUOTE]
Well thanks for telling me something I already know. Your card will not run that game smoothly at maxed settings. Hell, I thought I was playing the game smoothly with 7800gtx's, until I got my 8800gtx. I then realised how crappy and slow the game was prior.
30 FPS is crappy in company of heros. If you're ever in Maryland I will show you the difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment